Work Cited
Sandra L. Brown. "Psychology Today: Pathological Relationships." www.psychologytoday.com. 11 Apr. 2011. Sussex Publishers,LLC. 5 Oct. 2012<http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/pathological-relationships/201104/recovery-without-justice-article-victims-rights-month>.
Ralph F. Ranieri. "Christian Life: Facing the Situation." www.catholicireland.net. Dec.2002. Irish Redemptonist. 5 Oct. 2012. <http://www.catholicireland.net/pages/index.php?nd=56&art=467>.
Tina Allen. "Do Childern Deserve Respect?" www.articlesnatch.com. 2011. Article Snatch,LLC. 5 Oct.2012.<http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=1245399286940517444#editor/target=post;postID=3359127340372700871>.
Friday, October 5, 2012
Do Children Deserve Respect?
Tina Allen argues that it is imperative that children know they are loved and cherished. She claims that without it how are the values to be passed on to our children. Allen develops this claim by first explaining how it is difficult to trust others if you do not trust yourself. Allen urges that it is the very early years where we can most greatly impact how children learn to trust and respect. Lastly the author says take a moment and watch your child for communication indicating their comfort. Tina Allen's purpose is to inform the caregiver that it is important to interact with the child in order to improve the child's overall trust, respect, and growth.
Tina Allen argues that it is imperative that children know they are loved and cherished. She claims that without it how are the values to be passed on to our children. Allen develops this claim by first explaining how it is difficult to trust others if you do not trust yourself. Allen urges that it is the very early years where we can most greatly impact how children learn to trust and respect. Lastly the author says take a moment and watch your child for communication indicating their comfort. Tina Allen's purpose is to inform the caregiver that it is important to interact with the child in order to improve the child's overall trust, respect, and growth.
Facing the Situation
Ralph F. Raneri argues that reconciliation is to "face up" to the problem. He claims that the first step is to admit you have a problem. Raneri develops this claim by first explaining how most people try to reconcile. Raneri suggests by apologizing and asking for forgiveness will help you grow through the process of reconciling. Lastly the author acknowledges the fact that if no one tries to reconcile then nothing gets resolved. Ralph F. Raneri's purpose is to explain reconciliation and its affects, in order to state why things are not resolved or reconciled with.
Ralph F. Raneri argues that reconciliation is to "face up" to the problem. He claims that the first step is to admit you have a problem. Raneri develops this claim by first explaining how most people try to reconcile. Raneri suggests by apologizing and asking for forgiveness will help you grow through the process of reconciling. Lastly the author acknowledges the fact that if no one tries to reconcile then nothing gets resolved. Ralph F. Raneri's purpose is to explain reconciliation and its affects, in order to state why things are not resolved or reconciled with.
Recovery Without Justice
Sandra l. Brown argues that judicial justice does not always lead to psychological or mental justice.If you were harmed by someone whether it was: physical,custody battles, infidelity,or spritual abuse,etc. then the person who inflicted all of this upon you would have to pay you money known as restitution to show their guilt and your pain. She claims that restitution itself really does not heal anything. Brown develops this claim by first acknowledging how our country''s judicial system acts.Brown explains victims seek comfort in the courtrooms and chambers hoping that their pain goes away. Lastly the author concludes that the victim must move on without justice, from a judicial system or restitution to fully move on with their life.Browns purpose is to interpret how justice can make one feel in order to explain how it should be served.
Sandra l. Brown argues that judicial justice does not always lead to psychological or mental justice.If you were harmed by someone whether it was: physical,custody battles, infidelity,or spritual abuse,etc. then the person who inflicted all of this upon you would have to pay you money known as restitution to show their guilt and your pain. She claims that restitution itself really does not heal anything. Brown develops this claim by first acknowledging how our country''s judicial system acts.Brown explains victims seek comfort in the courtrooms and chambers hoping that their pain goes away. Lastly the author concludes that the victim must move on without justice, from a judicial system or restitution to fully move on with their life.Browns purpose is to interpret how justice can make one feel in order to explain how it should be served.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)